30 April 2013

Studying The Weight and Gravitational Behavior of Antimatter


Weighing Antimatter
Physicists at the University of California, Berkeley are studying the difference between matter and antimatter in relation to how it interacts with gravity.

Particles that have the same mass but with the opposite charge and quantum spin are called antimatter. Antimatter was predicted to exist in 1928 through equations by Paul Dirac. The next year, it was first observed by two physicists but considered it an anomaly and was not studied further.

Three years later, in 1932, Carl D. Anderson also observed the same thing in his experiments but instead of treating it as an error, studied it further. Bt using gamma rays, he created an anti-particle; a positively charged electron. Electrons are negatively charged and his discovery proved Dirac was right and antimatter does exist.

Anderson was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1936 for this discovery.

All particles has its antiparticle counterpart. The antiparticle of the electron is the positron. It carries a positive charge rather than a negative one. The proton's version is the anti-proton and it carries a positive charge. Despite the neutron having a neutral charge, there is an antineutron which is made up of antiquarks (the antiparticle of the quark).

Gravity's Effect On Antimatter

Antimatter is strange stuff. It has the opposite electrical charge to normal matter and, when it meets its matter counterpart, the two annihilate in a flash of light.

Four University of California, Berkeley, physicists are now asking whether matter and antimatter are also affected differently by gravity. Could antimatter fall upward – that is, exhibit anti-gravity – or fall downward at a different rate than normal matter?

Almost everyone, including the physicists, thinks that antimatter will likely fall at the same rate as normal matter, but no one has ever dropped antimatter to see if this is true, said Joel Fajans, UC Berkeley professor of physics. And while there are many indirect indications that matter and antimatter weigh the same, they all rely on assumptions that might not be correct. A few theorists have argued that some cosmological conundrums, such as why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe, could be explained if antimatter did fall upward.

In a new paper published online on April 30 in Nature Communications, the UC Berkeley physicists and their colleagues with the ALPHA experiment at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Geneva, Switzerland, report the first direct measurement of gravity's effect on antimatter, specifically antihydrogen in free fall. Though far from definitive – the uncertainty is about 100 times the expected measurement – the UC Berkeley experiment points the way toward a definitive answer to the fundamental question of whether matter falls up or down.

Video: The Riddle of AntiMatter

"This is the first word, not the last," Fajans. "We've taken the first steps toward a direct experimental test of questions physicists and nonphysicists have been wondering about for more than 50 years. We certainly expect antimatter to fall down, but just maybe we will be surprised."

Fajans and fellow physics professor Jonathan Wurtele employed data from the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus (ALPHA) at CERN. The experiment captures antiprotons and combines them with antielectons (positrons) to make antihydrogen atoms, which are stored and studied for a few seconds in a magnetic trap. Afterward, however, the trap is turned off and the atoms fall out. The two researchers realized that by analyzing how antihydrogen fell out of the trap, they could determine if gravity pulled on antihydrogen differently than on hydrogen.

Antihydrogen did not behave weirdly, so they calculated that it cannot be more than 110 times heavier than hydrogen. If antimatter is anti-gravity – and they cannot rule it out – it doesn't accelerate upward with more than 65 Gs.

"We need to do better, and we hope to do so in the next few years," Wurtele said. ALPHA is being upgraded and should provide more precise data once the experiment reopens in 2014.

RELATED LINKS

University of California - Berkeley
Nature Communications
The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)
What Is Antimatter?
New Method To Cool Down Antimatter Using Lasers Proposed
New Advance in Antimatter: CERN ALPHA Group Measures Antihydrogen
Japan's Riken Edges Closer To Naming Atomic Element 113
Overcoming Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle In Polarization of Light Through The Direct Measurement Technique
Three Novel Converters Increases Neutron Detection Efficiency Threefold in Bulk-Micromegas Neutron Detectors